Page 1 of 1
How high does an antenna really need to be?
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:06 pm
by Casey
We want to be able to broadcast at either 5W, and get 3-4 mi as per the newbite guide, or go to 15W and go out to 6 mi. Haven't decided yet.
But we live in a 2 story house surrounded by other 2 story homes. It's a new subdiv so there's no tall trees around. Standing on the roof all you see is more roofs, in every direction (except the local park, about a mile away.)
What I want to know is, how high should our antenna be to get these distances? We live in a pretty flat area, so the earth's curvature formula says that you only have to be about 6 feet up to see a horizon of 3-4 mi. Would an antenna 10ft above the roof be enough?
Also, if the antenna itself is ~5ft tall, should the base of the antenna be where we measure to?
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:17 am
by pcs
Simple: The higher the better.
Re: How high does an antenna really need to be?
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:49 am
by Sir Nigel
First, just go with 15 watts. The extra watts will help get into the houses better.
As far as the antenna, maybe just a little more than 10 ft. You want the signal to go above the houses, not through them as that doesn't work. However if you have a choice of higher antenna vs. higher wattage, I would go with making the antenna taller.
Casey wrote:Also, if the antenna itself is ~5ft tall, should the base of the antenna be where we measure to?
Yes.
Casey wrote:We live in a pretty flat area, so the earth's curvature formula says that you only have to be about 6 feet up to see a horizon of 3-4 mi. Would an antenna 10ft above the roof be enough?
Likely yes, but remember, houses are going to block the signal, so adjust your "imaginary" horizon to compensate.
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:35 pm
by pcs
What would I do without you, Nigel
By the way, I gave you a special rebate for the RDS card.
PS: Have you heard from radioboy?
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:55 pm
by Casey
Thanks for the replies!
Follow-up question: Given that the antenna will need to be over 10 ft off the roof, and that might be a little conspicuous in the neighborhood, I'm wondering, what's the best antenna for me if 15W is the most I'm ever going to transmit at?
I looked at the comet, and although it's quite nice, it might be more antenna than I really need (given that it's rated for up to 200W). What I want is an antenna that's sufficient for a nice clean signal at 15W, and not much more. I was wondering whether a dipole would be sufficient for this? Any suggestions?
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:07 pm
by pcs
Power rating does not mean that antenna is "too strong" for you.
What's important here is how far do you actually want to go.
more power + bad antenna = less power + good antenna
less power + bad antenna = minimal range
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:39 pm
by Casey
Well, that makes sense, but is a dipole necessarily a "bad antenna", or is it just more suited for a lower power station?
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:12 pm
by pcs
It is antenna with less gain compared to 5/8 and 3/4 wave or
yagi antennas.
Another problem is proper balanced/unbalanced conversion.
Since dipole is balanced and coaxial cable is not. So just using
two sticks of proper length is not enough.
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 7:30 pm
by Casey
What antenna would you recommend for a person who is looking to broadcast at 15W, reach a range of ~5-6 miles, and wants an antenna that is inconspicuous?
Maybe that's how I should have phrased the question from the beginning.
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:14 am
by Sir Nigel
Either the proven Comet or the newer one here:
http://www.pcs-electronics.com/phpBB2/v ... php?t=1017
Inconspicuous? Well, it is an antenna so it will be conspicuous. perhaps you could put some shrubs around it.

just kidding.
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 1:25 am
by pcs
hmm, you could put the whole thing in a plastic tube maybe and
attach it to a chimney or something.
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 8:01 pm
by Casey
Well, less than being concerned about hiding the antenna altogether, I was more thinking about having something that didn't scream FM transmitter to nosy people. But more importantly, as I said above, since I don't expect to ever transmit greater than 15W, I don't want to buy an antenna that is more than I need. So I'm looking for an antenna suggestion that would be sufficient for broadcasting at that wattage.
Clearly the Comet is better than a simple dipole, and the high-gain is better than the Comet. But are they more than I need? That's what I'm trying to figure out. The smaller or less obtrusive the antenna is, the less likely I am to get the neighbors curious.
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 3:01 am
by woodro
just a thought. An antenna designed or that looks somewhat like a tv antenna would be nice

kinda incognito
micro yagi? Directional yes but with a small rotor it would keep a spin on things, maybe even a little harder to hunt down\zero in on especially at <15w
comments?
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:54 am
by pcs
Remember, same antenna can and is used for FM reception
so that's what you can allways claim.